Table E-05. Households making Arrangement with Police for Disposal of
Cases
Base
|
No. of Cases
|
Households making Prior Arrangement with Police
|
Kind of Arrangement
|
Complaints do not go to Court
|
Complaints go to Court quickly
|
Others
|
Total
|
103
|
49.5
|
55.3
|
38.3
|
6.4
|
Rural
|
92
|
48.9
|
54.8
|
38.1
|
7.1
|
Urban
|
11
|
54.5
|
60.0
|
40.0
|
0.0
|
Table E-06. Views on Time Elapsed Between recording Complaints and filing
Court Cases
Base
|
No of cases
|
Percent
|
Views on Time Elapsed Between recording Complaints
and filing Court Cases
|
On Time
|
Deliberately Delayed
|
Total
|
51
|
100
|
29.4
|
70.6
|
Rural
|
45
|
100
|
28.9
|
71.1
|
Urban
|
6
|
100
|
33.3
|
66.7
|
Table E-07. Households receiving Police Verification and Type of Arrangements
made with the Police
| Base |
No of cases
|
Percent
|
HHs reporting Police Verification
|
Type of arrangements made with the Police
|
Informed & Paid Money
|
Paid money to Police
|
Paid Money when Police came for Verification
|
Had to go the Police more than once
|
Not Stated
|
| Total |
2499
|
100
|
7.3
|
15.9
|
12.6
|
38.5
|
24.2
|
25.3
|
| Rural |
2220
|
100
|
5.6
|
14.4
|
13.6
|
40.0
|
28.0
|
23.2
|
| Urban |
279
|
100
|
20.4
|
19.3
|
10.5
|
35.1
|
15.8
|
29.8
|
(The percentages add to more than 100 because of multiple answers)
Table E-08. Public Perception of Corruption in Police Administration
Base
|
No of Cases
|
Percent
|
Opinion on Police Corruption
|
Completely Agree
|
Agree
|
No Opinion
|
Don't Agree
|
Don't Agree at All
|
No Response
|
Total
|
2498
|
100
|
58.4
|
37.9
|
2.8
|
0.7
|
0
|
0.2
|
Rural
|
2220
|
100
|
58.9
|
37.5
|
2.9
|
0.6
|
0
|
0.1
|
Urban
|
278
|
100
|
54.3
|
41.0
|
2.5
|
1.8
|
0
|
0.4
|
Table F-01. Households involved in land transaction and making Extra
Payments
Base
|
No of Cases
|
HHs selling/ buying Land
|
HHs making Extra Payments for Registration
|
Total
|
2487
|
22.7
|
54.4
|
Rural
|
2209
|
23.8
|
54.7
|
Urban
|
278
|
13.0
|
50.0
|
Table F-02.Households carrying out Mutation of Land and Property and
making Extra Payment
Base
|
No of Cases
|
Percentage
|
Mutation carried out through
|
Average Amount paid per HH (Tk.)
|
Extra Payment
|
Normal Process
|
Total
|
148
|
100
|
76.4
|
23.6
|
1003
|
Rural
|
124
|
100
|
78.2
|
21.8
|
910
|
Urban
|
24
|
100
|
66.7
|
33.3
|
1538
|
Table F-03. Views regarding Prices of Land Transactions shown on Documents
Base
|
No of Cases
|
Percentage
|
Buyers show Price lower than Actual Price to Reduce
Registration Costs?
|
Yes
|
No
|
Don't know
|
Total
|
2401
|
100
|
65.7
|
13.7
|
20.6
|
Rural
|
2134
|
100
|
65.5
|
14.2
|
20.4
|
Urban
|
267
|
100
|
67.4
|
10.1
|
22.5
|
Table F-04.Public Perception of Corruption in Land Administration
Assertion
|
Base
|
No of Cases
|
Perception and Views on Corruption in Land Administration
|
Completely Agree
|
Agree
|
No Comments
|
Don't Agree
|
Don't Agree At All
|
Not Stated
|
It is almost Impossible to Register and without
money or influence
|
Total
|
2500
|
27.8
|
43.4
|
13.5
|
13.4
|
1.0
|
0.8
|
Rural
|
2220
|
28.2
|
43.0
|
13.5
|
13.6
|
1.0
|
0.7
|
Urban
|
280
|
24.6
|
46.8
|
13.6
|
12.1
|
1.1
|
1.8
|
It is almost impossible to do mutation of land without
money or influence
|
Total
|
2501
|
23.4
|
49.1
|
17.1
|
8.7
|
1.0
|
0.8
|
Rural
|
2220
|
23.7
|
49.1
|
17.3
|
8.4
|
0.9
|
0.6
|
Urban
|
281
|
20.3
|
49.1
|
16.0
|
11.4
|
1.4
|
1.8
|
It is almost impossible to
Pay land taxes without money
or influence |
Total
|
2 500
|
15.0
|
33.2
|
20.8
|
27 4
|
2.3
|
1.4
|
Rural
|
2221
|
15.5
|
33.5
|
21.0
|
26.6
|
2.2
|
1.3
|
Urban
|
279
|
10.8
|
31.5
|
19.0
|
33.7
|
2.9
|
2.2
|
Table G-01. Households receiving full amount of Sanctioned Loan
Base
|
No of case
|
Percentage
|
Received full amount of loan
|
Yes
|
No
|
Total
|
140
|
100
|
74.3
|
25.7
|
Rural
|
127
|
100
|
72.4
|
27.6
|
Urban
|
13
|
1 100
|
1 92.3
|
7.7
|
Table G-02. Methods used by Households to obtain Loan
Base
|
No. of Cases
|
Percentage
|
Method used to get Loan:
|
Bank Employees
|
Local dalal
|
Influential People
|
Normal Process
|
Total
|
137
|
100
|
45.3
|
5.1
|
3.6
|
46.0
|
Rural
|
126
|
100
|
44.4
|
4.8
|
3.2
|
47.6
|
Urban
|
11
|
100
|
54.5
|
9.1
|
9.1
|
27.3
|
Table G-03. Actions taken by Banks for Loan Recovery
Base
|
No. of Cases
|
Percent
|
HHs facing Actions by Banks for Loan Recovery
|
Confiscation of Assets
|
Court Case
|
Arrest by Police
|
No Loan given in Future
|
Others
|
Total
|
136
|
100
|
55.1
|
53.7
|
41.9
|
47.8
|
11.0
|
Rural
|
124
|
100
|
53.2
|
54.0
|
42.7
|
46.8
|
11.3
|
Urban
|
12
|
100
|
75.0
|
50.0
|
33.3
|
58.3
|
8.3
|
Table G-04. Households required submitting Documents for Getting Loan
from Batiks and Extra Expenditure Incurred for Documents
Base
|
No. of Cases
|
HHs req. to provide Document (Percent)
|
Households by Amount of Extra Expenditure
|
Average Amount spent Per HH (Tk.)
|
Up to Tk. 100
|
Tk. 101-200
|
Tk. 201 – 300
|
Tk.300+
|
Total
|
83
|
37.3
|
29.5
|
37.7
|
6.6
|
26.2
|
194
|
Rural
|
75
|
38.7
|
31.5
|
37.0
|
7.4
|
28.1
|
190
|
Urban
|
8
|
25.0
|
14.3
|
42.9
|
-
|
42.9
|
250
|
Table G-05. Public View on getting Loan from Banks
Base
|
No. of Cases
|
Percentage
|
Agreement or Disagreement with the assertion: ‘It
is almost impossible to get loan from banks without money of influence'.
|
Completely Agree
|
Agree
|
No Comment
|
Don't Agree
|
Don't Agree At All
|
Not Stated
|
Total
|
2500
|
100
|
36.9
|
36.6
|
18.2
|
6.4
|
1.0
|
1.0
|
Rural
|
2222
|
100
|
36.6
|
36.4
|
18.6
|
6.3
|
1.0
|
1.0
|
Urban
|
278
|
100
|
38.8
|
38.8
|
14.7
|
6.5
|
0.4
|
0.7
|
Table H-01. State of Water Supply in Urban Areas
Base
|
No. of Cases
|
Percentage
|
Households with
|
Municipal Water Supply
|
No Municipal Water Supply
|
Not stated
|
Total Urban
|
279
|
100
|
43.7
|
55.9
|
0.4
|
HH with a Male Head
|
256
|
100
|
44.1
|
55.5
|
0.4
|
HH with a Female Head
|
23
|
100
|
39.1
|
60.9
|
0.0
|
Table H-02. Receipt and Payment of Water Supply Bill
Base
|
No of Cases
|
0/0 of HHs receiving Water Bills Regularly
|
No.of Cases
|
HHs paying Water Bills Regularly
|
Total Urban
|
77
|
72.7
|
65
|
96.9
|
HH with a Male Head
|
71
|
73.2
|
59
|
96.6
|
HH with a Female Head
|
6
|
100.0
|
5
|
100.0
|
Table H-03. Reduced Water Bill obtainable by Arrangement
Base
|
No. of Cases
|
Percentage
|
Reduced Water Bill obtainable by Arrangement?
|
Obtainable
|
Not obtainable
|
Total Urban
|
69
|
100
|
31.9
|
68.1
|
HH with a Male Head
|
64
|
100
|
31.3
|
68.7
|
HE with a Female head
|
5
|
100
|
40.0
|
60.0
|
Table H-04. Difficulties faced in getting Water Supply Line
Base
|
No of cases
|
Percent
|
Difficulties in getting Water Supply Line
|
Additional Money had to be paid
|
Extra Time required
|
Repeated Visits required
|
No Difficulties
|
Not stated
|
Total Urban
|
122
|
100
|
17.2
|
12.3
|
16.4
|
26.2
|
50.8
|
HH with a Male Head
|
113
|
100
|
16.8
|
11.5
|
16.8
|
26.5
|
50.4
|
HH with a Female Head
|
9
|
100
|
22.2
|
22.2
|
11.1
|
22.3
|
55.6
|
(The percentage add up to more than 100 because of multiple answers)
Table H-05. - Public View regarding Corruption in getting Municipal Water
Supply
Measuring Statement
|
No. of cases
|
Percent
|
Public view regarding the Statements
|
Completely Agree
|
Agree
|
No comments
|
Disagree
|
Do not Agree At All
|
Not Stated
|
It is almost impossible to get water supply line
without money or influence
|
280
|
100
|
24.6
|
35.0
|
27.5
|
10.0
|
0.4
|
2.5
|
It is almost impossible to get correct water bill
without money or influence
|
123
|
100
|
10.6
|
34.1
|
24.4
|
21.3
|
0.8
|
0.8
|
Table H-06. Households with Electricity Connection and Receiving Bills
regularly
Base
|
No. of Cases
|
HHs with Electricity
|
No. of Cases
|
Households receiving Electric Bills regularly
|
Yes
|
No
|
Not stated
|
Total Urban
|
281
|
80.1
|
224
|
63.4
|
12.5
|
24.1
|
HHs with a Male Head
|
257
|
79.8
|
205
|
62.4
|
12.7
|
24.9
|
HHs with a Female Head
|
24
|
83.3
|
19
|
73.7
|
10.5
|
15.8
|
Table H-07. Underbilling and Payment of Bills for Electricity
Base
|
No. of Cases
|
Reduced Electricity Bill obtainable by Arrangement
|
Households Paying Bills Regularly
|
Yes
|
No
|
Not Stated
|
Yes
|
No
|
Not stated
|
Total Urban
|
225
|
29.8
|
40.4
|
29.8
|
71.6
|
2.7
|
25.8
|
HHs with a Male Head
|
205
|
29.3
|
40.0
|
30.7
|
70.7
|
2.9
|
26.3
|
HHs with a Female Head
|
20
|
35.0
|
45.0
|
20.0
|
80.0
|
0.0
|
20.0
|
Table H-08. Households facing Difficulties in getting Electricity Connection
Base
|
No. of Cases
|
Percent
|
Type of difficulties faced
|
Paid Money to Officials
|
Needed Repeated Visits to Office
|
Undue Delay to Supply Meter
|
Extra money for electric accessories
|
No Difficulties Faced
|
Other
|
Tota Urban
|
225
|
100
|
24.0
|
21.3
|
11.6
|
9.3
|
29.3
|
39.6
|
HHs with a Male Head
|
205
|
100
|
24.9
|
21.5
|
11.7
|
9.3
|
29.8
|
31.5
|
HHs with a Female Head
|
20
|
100
|
15.0
|
20.0
|
10.0
|
10.0
|
25.0
|
40.0
|
(Percentages add to more than 100 due to multiple choice of answer.
Table H-09. Public View regarding Electricity Connection and Correct
Electricity Bill
Statement relating to Electricity Connection and
Billing Procedure
|
No. of cases
|
Percent
|
Completely Agree
|
Agree
|
No comment
|
Don't agree
|
Don't Agree At All
|
Not stated
|
It is almost impossible to get electric connection
without money or influence.
|
281
|
100
|
31.3
|
35.9
|
12.5
|
16.7
|
0.7
|
2.8
|
It is almost impossible to get correct electricity
bill with out money or influence.
|
280
|
100
|
16.4
|
29.6
|
20.7
|
27.9
|
1.8
|
3.6
|
Table H-10. Holding Tax Assessed and the Procedure of Reducing Holding
Tax
| Base |
No. of Cases
|
HHs' reaction to assessed holding tax
|
No. of cases
|
HHs reduced holding tax through
|
Acceptable
|
Excessive
|
Review Board
|
Arrangement with Officials
|
| Total Urban |
151
|
56.3
|
43.7
|
32
|
53.1
|
46.9
|
| HHs with a Male Head |
138
|
56.5
|
43.5
|
29
|
51.7
|
48.3
|
| HHs with a Female Head |
13
|
53.8
|
46.2
|
3
|
66.7
|
33.3
|
Table H-11. Payment of Holding Tax and Reasons for Delinquency
Base
|
No. of cases
|
HHs paying Holding Tax regularly (%)
|
No. of cases
|
HHs did not pay Holding Tax for (%)
|
Tax assessed was Excessive
|
Financial Difficulty
|
Others
|
Yes
|
No
|
Total Urban
|
145
|
89.7
|
10.3
|
10
|
30.0
|
50.0
|
20.0
|
HHs with a Male Head
|
132
|
89.4
|
10.6
|
9
|
33.3
|
44.4
|
22.2
|
HHs with a Female Head
|
13
|
92.3
|
7.7
|
1
|
-
|
100
|
-
|
Table H-12. Public Perception of Assessment of Holding Tax
Base
|
No. of Cases
|
Views on inference: It is impossible to get correct
assessment of Holding Tax without Money or Influence
|
Completely Agree
|
Agree
|
No Comments
|
Don't Agree
|
Don't agree at all
|
Not stated
|
Total Urban
|
281
|
14.9
|
30.2
|
23.1
|
15.7
|
0.7
|
15.3
|
HHs with a Male Head
|
257
|
15.2
|
30.4
|
22.6
|
16.0
|
0.8
|
15.2
|
HHs with a Female Head
|
24
|
12.5
|
29.2
|
29.2
|
12.5
|
-
|
16.7
|
Table H- 13.Households engaged in Business and Trade
Base
|
No. of Cases
|
HHs engaged in Business
|
No. of Cases
|
HHs engaged in Business with License
|
Yes
|
No
|
Not
Stated |
Yes
|
No
|
Not stated
|
Total Urban
|
279
|
35.1
|
63.1
|
1.8
|
98
|
56.1
|
38.8
|
5.1
|
HHs with a Male Head
|
256
|
367
|
61.3
|
2.0
|
94
|
55.3
|
39.4
|
5.3
|
HHs with a Female Head
|
23
|
17.4
|
82.6
|
-
|
4
|
75.0
|
25.0
|
-
|
Table H-14. Difficulties of getting Trade License
Base
|
No. of Cases
|
Difficulties of getting Trade License
|
Paid Additional Money to Officials
|
Paid repeated Visit to Office
|
Others
|
Not Stated
|
Total Urban
|
55
|
49.1
|
40.0
|
18.2
|
18.2
|
HHs with a Male Head
|
52
|
50.0
|
40.4
|
17.3
|
19.2
|
HHs with a Female Head
|
3
|
33.3
|
33. 3
|
33.3
|
-
|
(Percentages add to more than 100 due to multiple answers)
Table H-15. Views on Corruption in issuing Trade License
Base
|
No. of Cases
|
HHs by Scale of Agreement or Disagreement
|
Completely Agree
|
Agree
|
No comments
|
Don’t Agree
|
Don't Agree At All
|
Not Stated
|
Total Urban
|
282
|
27.0
|
38.3
|
21.3
|
7.8
|
0.4
|
5.3
|
HHs with a Male Head
|
258
|
27.1
|
38.4
|
20.5
|
8.1
|
0.4
|
5.4
|
HHs with a Female Head
|
24
|
25.0
|
37.5
|
29.2
|
4.2
|
-
|
4.2
|
Table I-01. Households using Public Transport by Type
Base
|
No. of cases
|
Households use Pubic Transport
|
No. of Cases
|
Type of Transport used by Households
|
Yes
|
No
|
Not Stated
|
Railway
|
Steamer
|
Bus
|
Not stated
|
Total
|
2501
|
59.4
|
40.1
|
0.5
|
1486
|
72.7
|
18.1
|
55.5
|
0.8
|
Rural
|
2221
|
58.2
|
41.4
|
0.5
|
1292
|
72.8
|
17.2
|
54.6
|
0.7
|
Urban
|
280
|
69.3
|
30.0
|
0.7
|
194
|
72.2
|
24.2
|
61.9
|
1.5
|
(Percentages add to more than 100 due to multiple answers)
Table I-02. Households reporting Difficulty buying Tickets and Type of
Difficulty
Base
|
No of cases
|
Households reporting Difficulty in buying Tickets
|
No. of cases
|
Households faced type of Difficulties in buying
Tickets
|
Yes
|
No
|
Not Stated
|
Extra Money was paid
|
Bought Ticket through Broker
|
Had to Buy in Advance
|
Not Stated
|
Total
|
1486
|
22.7
|
74.3
|
3.0
|
337
|
73.0
|
36.2
|
41.8
|
5.0
|
Rural
|
1292
|
22.6
|
74.6
|
2.8
|
292
|
73.6
|
38.4
|
42.1
|
4.5
|
Urban
|
194
|
23.2
|
72.2
|
4.6
|
45
|
68.9
|
22.2
|
40.0
|
8.9
|
(Percentages add to more than 100 due to multiple answers)
Table I-03. Views on Purchasing Tickets for travelling by Public Transport
Base
|
No. of Cases
|
Households by Scale of Agreement and Disagreement
with the statement:
It is almost impossible to purchase tickets without money or influence.
|
Completely Agree
|
Agree
|
No Comments
|
Don't Agree
|
Don't Agree At All
|
Not Stated
|
Total
|
1484
|
12.9
|
13.3
|
13.5
|
53.8
|
5.5
|
0.9
|
Rural
|
1291
|
13.4
|
12.8
|
14.4
|
53.2
|
5.3
|
0.9
|
Urban
|
193
|
9.3
|
17.1
|
7.8
|
58.0
|
6.7
|
1.0
|
Table I-03. Views on Purchasing Tickets for travelling by Public Transport
Base
|
No. of Cases
|
Households using Ferry Service
|
No. of Cases
|
Households using Ferry Service faced Difficulties
|
Yes
|
No
|
Not Stated
|
Long Wait due to shortage of ferry
|
Crossing early on payment of Extra Money to BIWTA
(breaking quique)
|
Ghat Passage risky
|
Others
|
Not stated
|
Total
|
1485
|
2.6
|
95.9
|
1.5
|
38
|
65.8
|
57.9
|
50.0
|
2.6
|
10.5
|
Rural
|
1291
|
1.9
|
96.7
|
1.3
|
25
|
56.0
|
64.0
|
52.0
|
-
|
12.0
|
Urban
|
194
|
6.7
|
90.2
|
3.1
|
13
|
84.6
|
46.2
|
46.2
|
7.7
|
7.7
|
(Percentages add to more than 100 due to multiple answers
Table J-01. Households reading or keeping abreast of News and Households'
Association of Importance
Base
|
No. of Cases
|
Households reading Newspaper or keeping abreast
of News
|
No. of Cases
|
Households dependence or Associating Importance
to news published in Newspapers
|
Yes
|
Not
|
Not Stated
|
Highly Important
|
Important
|
Not Important
|
Not at all important
|
Not Stated
|
Total
|
2499
|
60.2
|
39.7
|
0.1
|
1504
|
53.2
|
42.9
|
.13
|
0.5
|
2.2
|
Rural
|
2220
|
57.4
|
42.5
|
-
|
1274
|
50.7
|
45.1
|
.13
|
0.5
|
2.3
|
Urban
|
179
|
82.4
|
17.2
|
0.4
|
230
|
66.5
|
30.4
|
.13
|
0.4
|
1.7
|
Table J-02.Views regarding Unethical Standards and Corrupt Practice of
Newspapers
Base
|
No. of
Cases |
Households by Scale of Agreement or Disagreement
|
Completely Agree
|
Agree
|
No. Comments
|
Don't Agree
|
Don't Agree At All
|
Not Stated
|
Total
|
1505
|
41.3
|
42.2
|
13.4
|
2.6
|
0.3
|
0.1
|
Rural
|
1275
|
38.7
|
43.5
|
14.7
|
2.7
|
0.2
|
0.1
|
Urban
|
230
|
55.7
|
34.8
|
6.5
|
1.7
|
0.9
|
0.4
|
Table K-01. Public Perception of Corrupt Activities
(Figures are in percentages)
| Activities perceived as Corruption |
National
|
Rural
|
Urban
|
| Activity out side normal procedure |
67.7
|
67.7
|
67.4
|
| Negligence of responsibility |
75.7
|
75.6
|
76.3
|
| Misuse of position and power |
76.0
|
75.4
|
81.0
|
| Misuse of Fund |
50.6
|
50.5
|
51.6
|
| Misuse of power and fund for personal gain |
56.4
|
55.6
|
62.0
|
| While on duty taking money for personal
gain |
57.8
|
56.3
|
69.9
|
| Others (specify) |
3.7
|
3.8
|
2.9
|
Table K-02. Public Office and Institution pointed out for Corruption
| Public Office |
Respondents identifying Public Offices for Corruption
|
National
|
Rural
|
Urban
|
| Thana police office |
97.2
|
97.5
|
94.3
|
| Courts |
88.9
|
89.4
|
85.4
|
| Public hospitals |
78.6
|
79.1
|
74.6
|
| Sub-registrars office |
70.7
|
71.8
|
62.1
|
| Land record office |
67.9
|
68.3
|
64.3
|
| Tehsil office |
66.5
|
67.7
|
57.1
|
| Scheduled Banks |
62.3
|
63.0
|
56.8
|
| Thana Nirbahi office |
40.2
|
41.3
|
31.4
|
| Education offices |
35.3
|
34.9
|
38.6
|
Table K-03. Public Office or Institution identified as the Most Corrupt
Office
Rank
|
No of public office |
% of respondents identifying public offices as corrupt
|
National
|
Rural
|
Urban
|
1.
|
Thana police office |
58.1
|
57.9
|
59.7
|
2.
|
Courts |
18.5
|
18.6
|
18.0
|
3.
|
Public hospitals |
7.3
|
7.2
|
7.9
|
4.
|
Land record office |
5.5
|
5.2
|
7.9
|
5.
|
Sub-registrars office |
3.7
|
4.0
|
1.1
|
6.
|
Thana Nirbahi office |
2.2
|
2.4
|
0.7
|
7.
|
Tehsil office |
2.1
|
2.1
|
2.2
|
8.
|
Scheduled Banks |
1.4
|
1.5
|
0.7
|
9.
|
Education offices |
1.2
|
1.1
|
1.8
|
Table K-04. Views on Importance of the Office or Institution identified
as Most Corrupt in terms of Functions and Responsibilities
Base
|
No. of Cases
|
Households Viewed the Importance the Office or the
Institution in terms of its functions a responsibilities
|
Highly Important
|
Important
|
Not so Important
|
Not At All Important
|
Not Stated
|
Total
|
2497
|
55.4
|
41.6
|
1.4
|
0.3
|
2.5
|
Rural
|
2219
|
53.8
|
43.2
|
1.5
|
0.3
|
2.5
|
| Urban |
278
|
68.7
|
29.5
|
0.4
|
-
|
2.1
|
Table K-05.Public View of Reasons for Corruption in Government Offices
| Base |
No. of cases |
Public View of Reasons for
Corruption in Government Offices |
Inadequate Salary
|
Desire to be Rich Overnight
|
Moral degradation
|
No accountability
|
No Action by Political Parties
|
Others
|
Not stated
|
| Total |
2500 |
32.2 |
75.6 |
57.7 |
50.6 |
30.5 |
1.9 |
0.5 |
| Rural |
2220 |
31.2 |
77.3 |
57.8 |
49.8 |
29.3 |
1.9 |
0.5 |
| Urban |
280 |
39.6 |
62.1 |
57.1 |
56.8 |
40.4 |
2.1 |
0.7 |
|
