Table A-01. Households with Children attending Schools
Base |
No. of Cases |
Percentage |
Households with Children attending Schools |
Attending School |
Not attending School |
Total |
2500 |
100 |
68.2 |
31.8 |
Rural |
2220 |
100 |
67.8 |
32.2 |
Urban |
280 |
100 |
71.1 |
28.9 |
Table A-02. Distribution of Households by type of Institutions children
attending
Base |
No. of Cases |
Percent |
Households by type of Institutions children attending |
Primary & Kindergarten |
Secondary & Higher Secondary |
Other Institutions |
Total |
1704 |
100 |
72.5 |
37.4 |
29.2 |
Rural |
1505 |
100 |
74.2 |
36.1 |
27.6 |
Urban |
199 |
100 |
59.3 |
46.7 |
41.2 |
(Percentage add to more than 100 as there were households with children
attending more than one type of institutions)
Table A-03. Households reporting Difficulty for Admitting Children at
School
Base |
No. Of Cases |
Percentage |
Households having Difficulty |
Yes |
No |
Total |
1704 |
100 |
5.5 |
94.5 |
Rural |
1504 |
100 |
4.7 |
95.3 |
Urban |
200 |
100 |
11.5 |
88.5 |
Table A-04. Households facing Difficulties and using Extra Regular Procedure
for Admission of Children at School
Base |
No. of Cases |
Households facing Difficulty &
Uusing Extra Regular Method |
Households using Extra Regular Procedure |
No of Cases |
Distribution by Procedure |
Private tutor |
Political Influence |
Donation |
Other |
Total |
94 |
73.6 |
51 |
9.8 |
27.5 |
41.2 |
35.3 |
Rural |
71 |
72.9 |
37 |
10.8 |
29.7 |
40.5 |
35.1 |
Urban |
23 |
76.2 |
14 |
7.1 |
21.4 |
42.9 |
35.7 |
(Percentages add to more than 100 due to multiple answers)
Table A-05. Households with extra expenditure for admission by amount
spent
Base |
No. of Cases |
HHs with Extra Expenditure (Percent) |
Households by Amount of Extra Expenditure (Tk.) |
Av. Amount per HH (Tk.) |
HH engaging Teacher as Private Tutor |
Up to 500 |
501 – 1000 |
1001 - 2000 |
2001 - 5000 |
5000 + |
Total |
1652 |
3.6 |
50.7 |
16.4 |
3.0 |
2.5 |
- |
739 |
23.3 |
Rural |
1457 |
3.3 |
58.0 |
16.0 |
2.0 |
2.0 |
- |
658 |
23.7 |
Urban |
195 |
5.5 |
29.4 |
17.7 |
5.9 |
5.9 |
- |
1143 |
20.5 |
Table A-06. Households reporting Children Receiving Books from
the School and Amount Paid for Books
Base |
No. of Cases Books |
HHs receiving Books |
HHs Paid for Books |
Households by Amount Paid for
Supply of Books from School (Tk.) |
Av. Amount per HH (Tk.) |
HH received Books from
Teacher and Store |
Up to 2 |
3 - 5 |
6 - 10 |
11 - 15 |
15+ |
Total |
1374 |
74.4 |
53.2 |
13.6 |
26.2 |
14.3 |
2.3 |
1.9 |
5.30 |
5.0 |
Rural |
1223 |
77.0 |
54.0 |
14.3 |
27.1 |
13.9 |
2.1 |
1.4 |
5.10 |
4.8 |
Urban |
151 |
53.0 |
44.2 |
5.0 |
16.3 |
18.8 |
3.8 |
7.5 |
8.22 |
7.1 |
Table A-07. Households reporting Food for Education Programme
Base |
No. of Cases |
Percentage |
Households reporting 'Food for Education Programme" |
Yes |
No |
Total |
2499 |
100 |
22.0 |
78.0 |
Rural |
2220 |
100 |
24.1 |
75.9 |
Urban |
279 |
100 |
6.1 |
93.9 |
Table A-08. Illegal Activities in Distribution of Rice and Wheat in the
'Food for Education Programme'
Base |
No. of cases |
Households reporting Illegal Activities in Distribution
of Rice and Wheat |
Nepotism |
Quantity Less than Allocation |
Eligibility not Properly Assessed |
No Irregularities |
Total |
424 |
42.2 |
57.5 |
16.3 |
31.1 |
Rural |
415 |
42.2 |
57.6 |
16.4 |
31.6 |
Urban |
9 |
44.4 |
55.6 |
11.1 |
11.1 |
(Percentages add to more than 100 due to multiple answer)
Table A-09. Views on Illegal Practices in School
Base |
No. of Cases |
Households' View on Illegal Practices in School |
Good result or Promotion is difficult unless Teacher
is engaged as Tutor |
Extra Payment needed for Admission and Exam. Fees |
Scholarship Money is deducted by Teacher and Management |
Partial to Influential |
Other |
Not Responded |
Total |
675 |
48.9 |
50.8 |
26.5 |
33.2 |
14.7 |
1.5 |
Rural |
581 |
47.8 |
54.6 |
28.7 |
30.3 |
14.5 |
1.7 |
Urban |
94 |
55.3 |
27.7 |
12.8 |
51.2 |
16.0 |
- |
(Percentages add to more than 100 due to multiple answers)
Table A-10. Views on the assertion that Admission of Children at School
is not possible without Engaging School Teacher as Private Tutor/Donation/Influence
Base |
No. Of Cases |
Households by Scale of Agreement and Disagreement |
Completely Agree |
Agree |
No Comments |
Don't Agree |
Don't Agree At All |
Not Stated |
Total |
2498 |
5.4 |
15.7 |
28.6 |
45.7 |
3.7 |
0.8 |
Rural |
2219 |
5.1 |
14.0 |
29.5 |
46.7 |
3.8 |
0.9 |
Urban |
279 |
7.9 |
29.4 |
21.9 |
37.6 |
2.9 |
0.4 |
Table A- 11. Views on the assertion that for Getting Primary School Books
Additional Expenditure is necessary
Base |
No. of Cases |
Households by Scale of Agreement and Disagreement |
Completely Agree |
Agree |
No Comments |
Don't Agree |
Don't Agree At All |
Not Stated |
Total |
1197 |
10.8 |
34.3 |
11.9 |
36.0 |
5.8 |
1.3 |
Rural |
1102 |
10.9 |
34.2 |
11.8 |
35.8 |
6.0 |
1.3 |
Urban |
95 |
9.5 |
34.7 |
12.6 |
37.9 |
4.2 |
1.1 |
Table A- 12. Views on the assertion that Irregularity and Favouritism
in Food for Education Programme had become a Normal Practice
Base |
No. of Cases |
Households scale of Agreement and Disagreement |
Completely Agree |
Agree |
No Comments |
Don't Agree |
Don't Agree At All |
Not Stated |
Total |
552 |
10.1 |
37.0 |
25.0 |
18.8 |
7.4 |
1.6 |
Rural |
534 |
9.9 |
37.1 |
24.9 |
18.9 |
7.7 |
1.5 |
Urban |
18 |
16.7 |
33.3 |
27.0 |
16.7 |
- |
5.6 |
Ttable B-01. Distribution of Households using Govt. Hospital Services
Base |
No. of Cases |
Percentage |
Households using Public Hospital Services |
Yes |
No |
Total |
2502 |
100 |
28.1 |
71.9 |
Rural |
2221 |
100 |
27.6 |
72.4 |
Urban |
281 |
100 |
31.7 |
68.3 |
Table B-02. Distribution of Households using Govt. Hospital Services
by Incidence of Diseases
Base |
No. of Cases |
Households sought Treatment by Type of Diseases |
Cough and Cold |
Malaria |
Diarrhea and Cholera |
Female Pregnancy Diseases |
Asthma and Respiratory |
Skin Diseases |
Other |
Total |
687 |
20.5 |
7.0 |
12.4 |
8.2 |
4.5 |
2.9 |
64.5 |
Rural |
599 |
20.4 |
7.8 |
12.4 |
8.0 |
4.5 |
3.0 |
64.3 |
Urban |
88 |
21.6 |
1.1 |
12.5 |
9.1 |
4.5 |
2.3 |
65.9 |
(Percentages add to more than 100 as in some households there might be
more than one patient.
Table B-03. Households reporting Extra Payment for Outpatient Treatment
Base |
No. of Cases |
Percentage |
Households reporting Extra Payment |
Yes |
No |
Total |
551 |
100 |
39.4 |
60.6 |
Rural |
474 |
100 |
39.9 |
60.1 |
Urban |
77 |
100 |
36.4 |
63.6 |
Table B-04. Modality used for Admission into Government Hospital
Base |
No. of Cases |
Households by use of Extra Regular Method for Admission
into Hospital (Percent) |
Payment of consultation fee at Private Chamber |
Through Hospital Staff |
Through Class IV Hospital Employee |
Paying Extra Cash Directly |
Through Influential Person on Payment |
Through Normal Process |
Total |
236 |
19.9 |
9.3 |
3.8 |
17.8 |
8.5 |
40.7 |
Rural |
203 |
21.7 |
7.9 |
3.9 |
19.2 |
8.4 |
38.9 |
Urban |
33 |
9.1 |
18.2 |
3.0 |
9.1 |
9.1 |
51.5 |
Table B-05. Supply of Medicines from Hospital
Base |
No. of Cases |
Percentage |
Households received Medicines from Hospital prescribed |
Households received Medicines |
Yes |
No |
Fully |
Partially |
Total |
673 |
100 |
58.7 |
41.3 |
88.6 |
11.4 |
Rural |
588 |
100 |
58.3 |
41.7 |
88.7 |
11.3 |
Urban |
85 |
100 |
61.2 |
38.8 |
88.2 |
11.8 |
Table B-06. Households Advised to Get Medicines from Designated Shop
Base |
No.
of Cases |
Percentage |
Advised to Get Medicine -from Designated Shop |
Yes |
No |
Total |
624 |
100 |
26.1 |
73.9 |
Rural |
546 |
100 |
27.3 |
72.7 |
Urban |
78 |
100 |
17.9 |
82.1 |
Table B-07. Households having Pathological Tests, X-ray and Medical Operation
and Place of Service
Base |
No. of Cases |
Percentage |
Households having Tests and Operations |
Households by Place of Service for Tests and Operations |
Yes |
No |
Govt. hospital |
Private Hospital |
Total |
2495 |
100 |
20.0 |
80.0 |
21.3 |
78.7 |
Rural |
2216 |
100 |
18.1 |
82.0 |
20.6 |
79.4 |
Urban |
279 |
100 |
40.5 |
59.5 |
23.1 |
76.9 |
Table B-08. Households making Extra Payments for Pathological Tests,
X-rays and other Medical Tests
Base |
No. of Cases |
HHs making Extra Payments (Percent) |
Households by Extra Payment made |
Av. Amount spent per HH (Tk.) |
Up to Tk. 25 |
Tk. 26 - 50 |
Tk. 51 - 100 |
Tk. 101 - 500 |
Tk. 500+ |
Not Stated |
Total |
158 |
62.0 |
36.7 |
27.6 |
9.2 |
5.1 |
7.1 |
14.3 |
95 |
Rural |
133 |
66.9 |
39.3 |
28.1 |
9.0 |
4.5 |
6.7 |
D2.4 |
89 |
Urban |
25 |
36.0 |
11.1 |
22.2 |
11.1 |
11.1 |
11.1 |
133.3 |
171 |
Table B-9. Reasons for Tests, X-rays and Operations done in Private Clinics
Base |
No. of Cases |
Percent |
HHs with reasons for Tests, etc. done in Private
Clinics |
Poor Service in Government Hospital |
Doctor Advised to go to Private Clinics |
Total |
317 |
100 |
50.2 |
49.8 |
Rural |
240 |
100 |
48.3 |
51.7 |
Urban |
77 |
100 |
55.8 |
44.2 |
Table B-10. Public View on the assertion that 'It is almost impossible
to get admission into government hospital without money or influence'
Base |
No. Of Cases |
Households Scale of Agreement or Disagreement |
Completely Agree |
Agree |
No Comments |
Don't Agree |
Don't Agree At All |
Not Stated |
Total |
2498 |
26.4 |
43.5 |
14.1 |
11.1 |
0.9 |
3.9 |
Rural |
2219 |
26.3 |
43.3 |
14.8 |
10.6 |
0.9 |
4.1 |
Urban |
279 |
26.9 |
45.2 |
9.0 |
15.4 |
1.1 |
2.5 |
Table B-11. Public View on the statement of assertion that 'It is almost
impossible to get medicines/services from hospital without money or influence'
Base |
No. Of Cases |
Percentage |
Households by Scale of Agreement or Disagreement |
Completely Agree |
Agree |
No Comments |
Don't Agree |
Don't Agree At All |
Not Stated |
Total |
2500 |
100 |
31.0 |
50.1 |
11.5 |
6.4 |
0.5 |
0.5 |
Rural |
2221 |
100 |
30.8 |
50.1 |
12.1 |
6.1 |
0.5 |
0.5 |
Urban |
279 |
100 |
33.0 |
50.2 |
7.2 |
8.6 |
0.7 |
0.4 |
Table C-01. Distribution of Households by Type of Court Cases
Base |
No. Of Cases |
Theft |
Decoity/ Murder |
Land/property related |
Political Repression |
Repression of women |
Terrorism/abduction |
Other |
Total |
239 |
6.7 |
6.7 |
59.4 |
3.8 |
3.3 |
10.5 |
9.6 |
Rural |
215 |
6.5 |
7.0 |
59.5 |
3.3 |
3.7 |
10.7 |
9.3 |
Urban |
24 |
8.3 |
4.0 |
58.3 |
8.3 |
- |
8.3 |
12.5 |
Table C-02. Payment of Bribe and Agencies to whom Payment was made
Base |
No. of Cases |
% of Households Paying Bribe |
Parties to whom payment (Bribe) was made |
Court employees |
Opponents lawyer |
Others |
Total |
219 |
63.0 |
71.3 |
16.3 |
12.4 |
Rural |
198 |
63.6 |
70.8 |
16.7 |
12.5 |
Urban |
21 |
57.1 |
77.8 |
11.1 |
11.1 |
Table C-03. Modality of Payment of Bribe to Court Officials
Base |
No. of cases |
percent |
Agency though who bribe was paid |
Directly |
Through lawyer |
Through Court official |
Through dalal |
Others |
Total |
135 |
100 |
53.3 |
28.1 |
12.6 |
11.1 |
3.0 |
Rural |
123 |
100 |
53.7 |
27.6 |
13.0 |
11.4 |
2.4 |
Urban |
12 |
100 |
50.0 |
33.3 |
8.3 |
8.3 |
8.3 |
Table C-04. Anticipation of Time for Settlement of Pending Cases
Base |
No. of cases |
Percent |
Respondents' Reply regarding Anticipate Time for
Settlement of Pending Cases |
Could Anticipate Time |
Uncertain about Time |
Total |
204 |
100 |
46.1 |
53.9 |
Rural |
187 |
100 |
44.9 |
55.1 |
Urban |
17 |
100 |
58.8 |
41.2 |
Male |
184 |
100 |
47.8 |
52.2 |
Female |
20 |
100 |
30.0 |
70.0 |
Table C-05. Views regarding Deliberate Delay in Settlement of Pending
Cases
| Base |
No. of Cases |
Percent |
Yes |
No |
| Total |
198 |
100 |
79.8 |
20.2 |
| Rural |
182 |
100 |
81.3 |
18.7 |
| Urban |
16 |
100 |
62.5 |
37.5 |
Table C-06. Reasons for Delay in Settlement of Court Cases
Base |
No. of Cases |
Percent |
Reasons for delay in settling cases |
Lawyers' Business interest |
Opponents' ill motive |
Court's high handedness |
Others |
Total |
144 |
100 |
42.4 |
53.5 |
43.1 |
4.9 |
Rural |
135 |
100 |
41.5 |
54.1 |
43 7 |
4.4 |
Urban |
9 |
100 |
55.6 |
44.4 |
33.3 |
11.1 |
(Percentages add to more than 100 because of multiple choice of answers
Table C-07. Public Perception of the Judiciary
Base |
No. of Cases |
Completely Agree |
Agree |
No Comments |
Don't Agree |
Don't Agree At All |
Not Stated |
Total |
2498 |
45.8 |
42.7 |
9.4 |
1.4 |
0.2 |
0.4 |
Rural |
2219 |
45.7 |
43.0 |
9.6 |
1.1 |
0.2 |
0.4 |
Urban |
279 |
47.0 |
40.5 |
7.9 |
3.6 |
0.4 |
0.7 |
Table D-01. Problems solved through Grameen Shalish
Base Rural |
No. of Cases |
Percent |
Type disputes solved through GS |
Land and Property Related |
Marital Problems |
Local Violence |
Others |
Total |
402 |
100 |
52.2 |
11.4 |
35.4 |
9.2 |
HHs headed by Males |
360 |
100 |
52.5 |
11.4 |
35.6 |
8.9 |
HHs headed by Females |
44 |
100 |
50 |
11.4 |
34.1 |
11.4 |
(Percentages add to more than 100 because of multiple answers)
Table D-02. Views on Fairness of GS
Base |
No. of Cases |
Percent |
Fairness of GS |
Yes |
No |
Don't know |
Total Rural |
2048 |
100 |
60.0 |
40.0 |
8.0 |
HHs headed by Men |
1817 |
100 |
59.5 |
40.5 |
8.0 |
HHs headed by Women |
231 |
100 |
63.2 |
36.8 |
9.5 |
(Percentages add to more than 100 because of multiple answer)
Table D-03. Public Views on Fairness of Grameen Shalish
Assertion |
No. of
Cases |
Opinion regarding the Assertion |
Completely
Agree |
Agree |
No
Comment |
Don't
Agree |
Don't
Agree
At All |
Not
Stated |
Favours the Rich |
821 |
54.8 |
38.7 |
2.3 |
1.2 |
0.1 |
2.8 |
Favours Males |
820 |
22.4 |
30.4 |
20.7 |
19.9 |
1.6 |
5.0 |
Dominated by Religious Fundamentalism |
819 |
15.4 |
28.4 |
26.3 |
24.1 |
2.1 |
3.8 |
Influenced by Terrorism |
820 |
30.4 |
36.3 |
9.1 |
17.1 |
1.8 |
5.2 |
Influenced by Money and Other Opportunity |
819 |
43.8 |
40.2 |
5.5 |
4.2 |
1.5 |
4.9 |
Table D-04. Steps to make Grameen Shalish Effective
Base |
No. of Cases |
Steps necessary to make GS Effective |
Equal Representation of Parties in Disputes |
Impartiality of GS to be Ensured |
Women Member In GS in Disputes Involving Women |
Others |
Total Rural |
2156 |
70.3 |
88.5 |
31.9 |
2.9 |
HHs with a Male Head |
1913 |
70.1 |
89.6 |
29.2 |
2.6 |
HHs with a Female Head |
243 |
72.0 |
79. 8 |
53.1 |
5.8 |
(Percentages add up to more than 100 because of multiple answers)
Table E-01. Involvement of Household in Police Cases
Base |
No. of cases |
Involved in Complaints |
Involved as |
Complainants |
Accused |
Total |
2479 |
5.4 |
49.6 |
50.4 |
Rural |
2201 |
5.4 |
47.7 |
52.3 |
Urban |
278 |
5.4 |
64.3 |
35.7 |
Table E-02. Type of Offense recorded in Complaints with the Police Station
Bangladesh |
No. of Cases |
Percentage |
Type of Offense recorded in Complaints |
Theft |
Dacoity/Murder |
Land/Property |
Political repression |
Repression of women |
Terrorism |
Others |
Total |
123 |
100 |
17.9 |
5.7 |
26.8 |
8.1 |
11.4 |
19.5 |
14.6 |
Rural |
109 |
100 |
18.3 |
5.5 |
28.4 |
8.3 |
11.9 |
19.3 |
12.8 |
Urban |
14 |
100 |
14.3 |
7.1 |
14.3 |
7.1 |
7.1 |
21.4 |
28.6 |
Table E-03. Type of Complaints recorded with the Police
Base |
No. of Cases |
Percent |
Type of diary |
GD |
FIR |
Total |
127 |
100 |
45.7 |
54.3 |
Rural |
116 |
100 |
44.8 |
55.2 |
Urban |
11 |
100 |
54.5 |
45.5 |
Table E-04. Households making Payments for filing Complaints and Modality
of Payments
Base |
No. of Cases |
Households making Payments for filing Complaints |
Agency through whom Payments made |
Directly |
Police office employee |
Local dalal/broker |
Total |
72 |
68.1 |
40.0 |
34.0 |
26.0 |
Rural |
65 |
69.2 |
41.3 |
34.8 |
23.9 |
Urban |
7 |
57.1 |
25.0 |
25.0 |
50.0 |
|
