Draft speech notes for an Address by Mr. J.W. Shaver, Secretary General,
World Customs Organization to the Eighth International Anti-Corruption
Conference, 8 September 1997 in Lima, Peru
Mr Chairman, I was delighted to receive the invitation to address this
distinguished Conference because it provides me with an opportunity to
share with you the clear views the World Customs Organization has on the
critical issue of integrity and also to give you some information about
the steps that our Organization is taking to assist the 144 countries
who are our members to combat the insidious problem of corruption.
As the Organization of American States has so aptly noted, "Corruption
undermines the legitimacy of Government institutions and strikes at society,
moral order and justice, as well as at the comprehensive development of
people."
There are few public agencies in which the classic pre conditions for
institutional corruption are so conveniently presented as in a Customs
administration. The potent mixture of administrative monopoly coupled
with the exercise of wide discretion, particularly in a work environment
that may lack proper systems of control and accountability, can easily
lead to corruption. A Customs administration infected with corruption
is going to be seriously dysfunctional and the impact of the corruption
will be felt throughout the society.
I want to tell you that the real casualty is not Customs but the societies
that they are charged with serving. I am talking about ordinary men and
women who place their faith in an important public institution that then
fails to either deliver the protection they should reasonably expect or
the revenues that they need to build the basic infrastructure of their
community.
I am also referring to the impact that these ordinary citizens feel when
honest trade is deliberately impeded by greed thus subverting the opportunity
for them to benefit from the prosperity and economic well being that the
globalization of world trade now offers. Make no mistake, ordinary citizens
are the real casualties of corruption.
It is time to put corruption in a coffin, nail down the lid of that coffin
and bury corruption once and for all.
Ambitious? At the WCO we think it is not impossible, although we are
pragmatic and experienced enough to understand the size and complexity
of the task that we have embarked upon.
Let me say that our determination is born from our mission to improve
the efficiency and effectiveness of Customs administrations and no single
factor undermines achieving this very worthy objective more than a culture
of corruption.
We also understand that to bring our work to a successful conclusion
we must have powerful and effective support from two sectors who, more
than anyone else, have the ability to influence cultural change. National
political leaders and members of the international trading community must
champion integrity.
Firstly, therefore I issue a challenge to political leaders to provide
us with the first nail to hammer shut the corruption coffin. They can
do that by leading through example and by valuing and rewarding integrity
within Government institutions. Behaviour within a Customs Administration
is often symptomatic of a wider malaise within a society. It often presents
as a sub-culture that mimics the values and behaviours of those who have
influence. As an example of political leadership, I commend to you the
Organization of American States Inter-American Convention against corruption,
the OECD's 1994 AntiCorruption Recommendation, the anti-corruption activities
of the World Bank and IMF, and the 1996 UN Declaration Against Corruption
and Bribery in International Commercial Transactions.
Political leaders must provide support to modernize their Customs administrations
and to fund programmes that will upgrade and automate Customs processes
thus assuring the correct collection of revenues while reducing the arbitrary
intervention that occurs in non automated processes. They can also ensure
that the remuneration levels for Customs employees are sufficient to provide
them with an adequate and dignified lifestyle. These actions will remove
negative role models, opportunity and economic need from the corruption
equation.
The second sector that must join the fight against corruption consists
of all the participants in the international trade environment. By this
I mean importers, exporters, airlines, shipping companies, port and airport
authorities, trade consultants and others with international commercial
interests. They should act individually and collectively with leadership
from their regional and international associations. They should simply
say no to ever being a party to corrupt practices. No is a simple word
that is understood by everyone. Corruption at and beyond borders must
be regarded as the Devil's Contract.
We at the WCO, urge that those in international commerce establish strict
enforceable ethical standards to ensure that all international trade transactions
are conducted with propriety and not on the basis of commercial expediency
or the seeking of an unfair competitive advantage. The only commercial
interests that we want to be associated with are those who are good corporate
citizens. Impropriety must be exposed at every turn for public exposure
is a powerful weapon. Corporate reputation is going to become a far more
important criteria for Customs inspection programmes than it has been
in the past. Selectivity, after all, is about targeting risk and not unreasonably
it is likely that an importer or exporter with a reputation for dubious
dealings will be subjected to closer Customs scrutiny. In this area, we
are most appreciative of the efforts of the International Chamber of Commerce
and Transparency International.
International commerce also has another vital role to play in the issue
of Customs integrity and that is by providing the transaction data in
a format for automated systems that will enable Customs to make informed
decisions on consignments within a seamless process that will eliminate
unreasonable and unnecessary physical intervention.
There you have it - two more nails are driven home against pervasive
corruption and I have not yet begun to talk about what we in the WCO are
doing ourselves to improve the situation or the action that some' individual
Customs administrations are themselves taking.
At the WCO we have a number of programmes that we have developed and
are developing that will harmonize and simplify globally, the Customs
clearance processes. We make available the Harmonized System to our members
to provide a uniform method of classifying and describing goods being
traded internationally. We administer the set of rules to determine the
value of goods using the GATT valuation method, and in conjunction with
the WTO, we are currently developing rules which will enable the origin
of goods to be determined in a uniform and consistent way, world-wide.
The existence of all these instruments provides certainty to international
trade and removes the fertile ground from which corrupt practices can
flourish. If the trade documentation correctly describe the goods, correctly
value the goods and correctly certify the origin of the goods then there
is little room for dispute and the consignment should benefit from swift
release from Customs control. It all adds up to much greater consistency
and transparency and it makes it extremely difficult for individuals to
impose arbitrary interpretations for personal benefit. To a very great
degree this disempowers would be corrupt officials - and so another three
nails are hammered home.
In 1993, members of the World Customs Organization held their annual
general meeting in Arusha, Tanzania and agreed on a code in relation to
integrity within Customs administrations. We know it as the Arusha Declaration
and it lists 12 specific practical steps that can be taken by a Customs
Administration that should either prevent corruption or assist in detecting
it . It is a veritable box of strong sharp nails. Some, I have touched
on already but let me enumerate the critical elements because each is
of considerable importance in the Customs environment. I am sure many
may also be relevant to your own organizations or area of interest.
-
Customs legislation should be clear and precise. Import tariffs should
be moderated where possible. The number of duty rates should be limited.
Administrative regulation of trade should be reduced to the absolute
minimum and there should be as few exemptions to the standard rules
as possible.
-
Customs procedures should be simple and consistent and easily accessible
and should include a procedure for appealing against decisions of the
Customs, with the possibility of recourse to independent adjudication
in the final instance. The procedures should be based on the Kyoto Convention
(a WCO Convention which seeks to simplify and standardize international
Customs procedures) and should be framed as to reduce to a minimum the
inappropriate exercise of discretion.
-
Automation (including EDI) is a powerful tool against corruption,
and its utilization should have priority. This is of utmost importance
in the international trade environment today and the benefits of a proper
system far outweigh the cost of development and installation.
-
In order to reduce the opportunities for malpractice, Customs managers
should employ such measures as the strategic segregation of functions,
rotation of assignments and random allocation of examinations among
Customs officers and, in certain circumstances, regular relocation of
staff.
-
Line managers should have prime responsibility for identifying weaknesses
in working methods and in the integrity of their staff, and for taking
steps to rectify weaknesses.
-
Internal and external auditing are essential, effective internal auditing
being a particularly useful means of ensuring that Customs procedures
are appropriate and are being implemented correctly. The internal auditing
arrangements should be complemented by an internal affairs staff that
has the specific task of investigating all cases of suspected malpractice.
-
Management should instil in it's officers loyalty and pride in their
service, an "esprit de corps" and a desire to co-operate in
measures to reduce their exposure to the possibility of corruption.
-
The processes for the recruitment and advancement of Customs officers
should be objective and immune from interference. The process should
include a means of identifying applicants who have, and are likely to
maintain, a high standard of personal ethics.
-
Customs officers should be issued with a Code of Conduct, the implications
of which should be fully explained to them. There should be effective
disciplinary measures, which should include the possibility of dismissal
and prosecution.
-
Customs officers should receive adequate professional training throughout
their careers, which should include coverage of ethics and integrity
issues.
-
The remuneration received by Customs officers should be sufficient
to afford them a decent standard of living, and may in certain circumstances
include social benefits such as healthcare and housing facilities, and/or
incentive payments.
-
Customs administrations should foster an open and transparent relationship
with Customs brokers and with the relevant sectors of the international
trade and business communities. Liaison committees are useful in this
respect.
So there you have it - twelve very sensible and practical steps, each
of which, represents a vital nail to assist us in securing the lid on
corruption.
The Arusha Declaration has been recognized and endorsed by UNCTAD. At
the UNCTAD Trade Efficiency Symposium held in Columbus, Ohio in October
1994, a recommendation was adopted that stated, Governments should take
steps to ensure the highest level of integrity and professional standards
within their Customs administration. The measures identified by the WCO
in its Arusha Declaration on Integrity in Customs should be implemented.
The UNCTAD recommendation went on to say that effective measures are also
required to discourage low standards of integrity in the international
trading community.
Since the Arusha Declaration, the WCO has put a tremendous amount of
time and energy in designing a comprehensive Customs Reform and Modernization
programme that integrates the principles set out in the Arusha Declaration
into a wider package that our members can use to undertake the fundamental
reform of both their processes and organization.
The need for such a programme arises because of a number of different
influences - the reduction of tariff barriers, the projected growth in
world trade, the intolerance of Governments to unreasonable Customs intervention,
the need for Customs to facilitate prosperity and not stand in the way
of it, and of course, the important issue of integrity.
In some instances, the Customs patient has been so ill that the Government
has directed that in order to protect revenues, inspection activities
should be undertaken by foreign private inspection services. This is obviously
a second best option because an effective Customs administration is an
integral part of any nation's sovereignty. At the WCO, we accept the use
of private inspection services only in extreme cases and then only as
a temporary measure to provide a breathing space so that the affected
Customs Administration has an opportunity to reform and modernize its
processes and organization in a holistic way to ensure that it is able
to meet the expectations of Government.
Our Customs Reform and Modernization programme consists of a number of
critical elements. The first and most important is to win the support
of high level policy makers and get their commitment to providing the
support and resources to facilitate the necessary change. A diagnostic
study is then undertaken by the top management of the Customs administration
assisted by an external team of experienced Customs experts.
The plan that emerges from this study - which is likely to involve the
introduction of automated solutions , new human resource development strategies
( including educational qualifications, desired skill sets, remuneration,
ethical standards, tenure and accountability) and redesigned inspection
selection processes based on informed risk assessment and organizational
criteria (not criteria set by individuals for their own purpose) is then
implemented. Subsequent to the introduction of the changes, their success
is evaluated and measured against specially designed performance criteria.
As I mentioned earlier we have put a tremendous amount of time and creativity
into designing what is essentially a structured and guided self help programme
of reform and in doing so we have been enormously encouraged by the support
and encouragement we have received from international organizations such
as the WTO, OECD, World Bank, IMF, UNCTAD, ICC and Transparency International
plus commercial interests involved in international trade and donor administrations
who provide expert personnel and funding to assist our reform programmes
around the world. Indeed, in July, a special course was held in Vina del
Mar, Chile to train a group of reform and modernization facilitators from
South American Customs administrations. We also have a number of projects
underway in other parts of the world which we are sure will deliver positive
benefits to the respective Governments and international trade generally.
Let me say that these are real benefits and I can do no better than to
provide you some details of the outcome of a reform and modernization
project that was undertaken by the Peruvian Customs Administration and
which were reported in April to an international Forum on Customs Reform
and Modernization which was held in Brussels. They are indicative of what
can be achieved through determined action.
Peruvian Customs have increased revenue receipts from a level of US $
625 million in 1990 to US $2 billion 675 million in 1995, against a background
of tariff rates being dramatically reduced. Duty collection has been automated
to enable payments to be made using electronic banking and the average
consignment clearance time has been reduced from 5 days to 2 hours. The
Customs workforce has been reduced considerably and new recruitment and
training policies put in place. Staff with professional backgrounds now
represent over 70% of the workforce in sharp contrast to the 2% employed
in 1990. There is zero tolerance for corruption and a single act of corruption,
no matter how small, leads to immediate dismissal.
I let these outstanding results speak for themselves. It shows that while
we have the ability to nail shut the coffin on corruption in the Customs
environment by using the means that I have discussed here today, a well
organized and determined Customs Reform and Modernization Programme is
a big part of the answer.
In closing, I want to remind you that no government, organization or
administration is going to be able to rid the world of corruption in politics,
international commerce and law enforcement unless we work together with
vigour and determination to change the underlying culture that makes such
dishonest practices acceptable. Let us forge a partnership to do all we
can in every sector of international trade to bury the corruption coffin
forever. We owe it to those we serve.
|